worldwiki
journalEvidence level BIndependent
Evidence page

The Efficacy of Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer Versus Conventional Lipotransfer in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Europe PMC record, PMID 33452543)

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (via Europe PMC)

Published Jan 1, 2021accessed Oct 29, 2026Updated Oct 29, 2026
Original source

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/search?query=DOI:10.1007/s00266-020-02123-0&format=json&resultType=core

ebi.ac.uk

Verification

VerificationIndependent of the subject
Evidence levelB · Peer-reviewed or professional body
IndependentIndependent of the subject
Sourcejournal
Link statusAutomated link check failed (may still open in a browser)

Official claims are statements by the provider; they are not verified by worldwiki unless marked otherwise. Source policy

Cited by (7)

FactSVF Breast Augmentation: Breast augmentation meta-analysis (Li & Chen) = 6 studies, 353 patients: CAL had higher fat survival (SMD 1.79, 95% CI 0.28–3.31); complications did not differ significantly (OR 1.34); the SVF-enriched subgroup showed no survival differenceAnswer幹細胞（SVF）を混ぜると、普通の脂肪注入豊胸より本当に定着率は上がるのですか？AnswerSVF를 섞으면 일반 자가지방이식보다 확실히 더 잘 생착된다는 독립적인 근거가 있나요?Answer수술 후 석회화나 낭종이 생기면 나중에 유방암 검진에 지장이 있나요?Answer加了SVF是不是真的比普通脂肪移植存活率高？有没有独立研究证明？Answer有乳腺结节或乳腺癌家族史的人能做吗？长期安全性数据够不够？Answerما الفرق بين تكبير الثدي بالدهون المعززة بـ SVF وحقن الدهون الذاتية المعتاد؟