journalEvidence level BIndependent
Evidence pageAutologous fat grafting for cosmetic temporal augmentation: a systematic review (Nasim S et al., Front Surg 2024;11:1410162)
Frontiers in Surgery (via PubMed Central)
Published Sep 20, 2024accessed Nov 11, 2026Updated Nov 11, 2026
Original source
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11449973/
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Verification
| Verification | Independent of the subject |
| Evidence level | B · Peer-reviewed or professional body |
| Independent | Independent of the subject |
| Source | journal |
| Link status | Reachable at last check |
Official claims are statements by the provider; they are not verified by worldwiki unless marked otherwise. Source policy
Cited by (2)
FactAutologous Fat: Reported volume retention (temple grafting) = 33–65% across 8 studies (719 patients); 46.4% with fat only vs 64.8% SVF-assisted %FactAutologous Fat: Evidence level (temple grafting) = 7 of 8 included studies were retrospective; most used subjective photo-based assessment; the authors call for RCTs with objective imaging